My personal take: I love the responsiveness of browsing with Luminar, but I find the inability to filter my collection based on metadata to be a huge drawback. This isn’t a deal-breaker, but hopefully, it will get optimized as the technology matures a little. The add-on tools all work reasonably well, although I found that the upscaling tool was significantly slower than several others that I’ve tried. If you purchase the cheaper Explore plan, you’ll have to purchase these modules individually. These tools all need to be installed individually from the Extras panel, but they’re included by default at the Pro level subscription. This section also contains the options for merging bracketed exposures into HDR images, automatically creating focus stacks, AI-powered image upscaling, and panorama stitching. You can filter your catalog based on a few basic metadata points such as favorite flags, capture time, or edit time, but there’s no way to filter based on more advanced metadata like lens type or ISO speed.įor most casual users, this won’t be a big deal, but professional photographers and anyone else with an extremely large image collection will probably find the tools too basic for any serious organizational work. Luminar’s organizational tools are on the basic side, giving you the ability to mark your images with a Favorite or Rejected flag, but there are no options for star ratings, colors, or any other level of fine-sorting. The Catalog section is nicely responsive, even when working with thousands of photos, which is a refreshing change compared to dealing with Adobe Lightroom, although I wish it was possible to force Luminar to generate thumbnails in the background. The Luminar Neo workflow begins with the Catalog section, which offers some simple tools for staying on top of a growing photo collection. The Edit section deserves a closer look, so I’ll test Luminar’s AI-powered tools and discuss them separately, as well as the standard photo development tools and layer-based editing. Luminar Neo has a huge range of features, and we don’t have space to review every single one of them, so I’m going to break down this review into more general sections based on the design of the Luminar user interface: image cataloging, preset adjustments, and editing options. The same principle holds true today – if I think it still needs more development work to be ready for real-world use, I will be sure to tell you. I’ve actually reviewed several different versions of Luminar over the course of its development, and while I could see that Luminar had a lot of potential, I chose not to recommend it because it still had a lot of ‘growing up’ to do. In my personal and professional work, I’ve used almost every digital image editor available today, and that experience helps me sort good editing apps from bad ones. If this is your first review with us here, I should introduce myself: I’m Thomas Boldt, and I’m a designer and photographer with decades of experience in the world of digital imagery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |